Introduction to Ethics Essay -- essays research papers

EthicsWhat are we like, and what should we do?As worldly concern we are faced with many decisions in animateness, which in and of itself, distinguishes us from the animal kingdom. Im sure other animals put to work decisions, but as servicemans we take into account our values and morals. In choosing which path to take with slightly of lifes decisions, ethics, are much at the center severely influencing our choices between what is remunerate and what is wrong. Which are normally defined by smart set, as to what is acceptable and what is not. As time goes on, parliamentary procedure adopts, so do the right and wrongs, our values and morals, and ethics. In philosophy, there were third ethical theories by Aristotle, Kant, and Bentham & pulverization and they were the Golden Mean, Categorical pressing, and great Good for the Greatest Number respectively.Aristotle believed the 1 goal every unity strived for was contentment for ones ownself. If you were a happy person, tha t would eventually lead to being a good person. He as well believed that all living things had current capacities, and that if one expires up to their wide capacities, they will have lived well and had a fortunate life. He went on to state that the perfection of reason leads to the schooling of two desirable virtues, object lesson and Intellectual. Moral virtues dealt with emotions. A person mustiness keep these in balance, to go in either extreme of as well much and in addition little, would be called the excess and the defect, respectively. The balance would be the think of. For example, courage is the mean between rashness (excess) and cowardice (defect). The golden mean is further study in NICOMACHEAN ETHICS. The RHETORIC, is where Aristotle sums up the three categories in an analogical description of life with the Youthful man (excess), the Elderly Man (defect), and the Man in His acme (golden mean).The Intellectual virtues dealt with foresight and wisdom. Aristot le stated the acquirement of these virtues could only be through by a select few. For one to be highly intellectual, is to be practically divine, next to the gods. With that being said, it discourage a lot of populate of that era. Thats when his theory was challenged and questioned. What about the artists or craftsmen? Are they denied happiness, because they havent attained intellectual perfection? Is in... ...ame-sex marriages and so on. It seems were in a shift of paradigms with the myriad of societal changes and acceptances. Is the solidarity of the human race degrading or evolving. Will todays ethics, be the same tomorrow or in the future? Will they evolve? It seems the chaotic world we live in, the right and wrong seem to respect those in power, or at least be influenced by those people. It also seems, we lower our standards to suit the masses. For example, the carrying of indorse packs in uniform, before it was prohibited for a Sailor to throw a bag over their shoulder. O nly if it was a seabag and only if some(prenominal) straps were on the shoulders. That standard has been altered, to allow plain shady back packs to be carried with both straps over the shoulders. There are too many people carrying the backpacks with one strap on the shoulder, presenting a relaxed amateurish appearance. Is the same happening to society with what is right and wrong? Are we labored our standards?ReferencesTHE STUDY OF PHILOSOPHY fifth EDITION, S.MORRIS ENGELARISTOTLE ON THE MEAN, G.ZINIEWICZKANT, DUTY, AND RESPECT, P.STRATTON-LAKETHE NINETEENTH CENTURY ROUTLEDGE news report OF PHILOSOPHY VOL. 7, C.L. TEN opening to Ethics Essay -- essays research papers EthicsWhat are we like, and what should we do?As humans we are faced with many decisions in life, which in and of itself, distinguishes us from the animal kingdom. Im sure other animals make decisions, but as humans we take into account our values and morals. In choosing which path to take with s ome of lifes decisions, ethics, are often at the center heavily influencing our choices between what is right and what is wrong. Which are usually defined by society, as to what is acceptable and what is not. As time goes on, society evolves, so do the right and wrongs, our values and morals, and ethics. In philosophy, there were three ethical theories by Aristotle, Kant, and Bentham & Mill and they were the Golden Mean, Categorical Imperative, and Greatest Good for the Greatest Number respectively.Aristotle believed the one goal everyone strived for was happiness for ones ownself. If you were a happy person, that would eventually lead to being a good person. He also believed that all living things had certain capacities, and that if one lives up to their full capacities, they will have lived well and had a fortunate life. He went on to state that the perfection of reason leads to the development of two desirable virtues, Moral and Intellectual. Moral virtues dealt with emotions. A person must keep these in balance, to go in either extreme of too much and too little, would be called the excess and the defect, respectively. The balance would be the mean. For example, courage is the mean between rashness (excess) and cowardice (defect). The golden mean is further analyzed in NICOMACHEAN ETHICS. The RHETORIC, is where Aristotle sums up the three categories in an analogical description of life with the Youthful Man (excess), the Elderly Man (defect), and the Man in His Prime (golden mean).The Intellectual virtues dealt with foresight and wisdom. Aristotle stated the attainment of these virtues could only be done by a select few. For one to be highly intellectual, is to be practically divine, next to the gods. With that being said, it discouraged a lot of people of that era. Thats when his theory was challenged and questioned. What about the artists or craftsmen? Are they denied happiness, because they havent attained intellectual perfection? Is in... ...ame-sex m arriages and so on. It seems were in a shift of paradigms with the myriad of societal changes and acceptances. Is the solidarity of the human race degrading or evolving. Will todays ethics, be the same tomorrow or in the future? Will they evolve? It seems the chaotic world we live in, the right and wrong seem to favor those in power, or at least be influenced by those people. It also seems, we lower our standards to suit the masses. For example, the carrying of back packs in uniform, before it was prohibited for a Sailor to throw a bag over their shoulder. Only if it was a seabag and only if both straps were on the shoulders. That standard has been altered, to allow plain black back packs to be carried with both straps over the shoulders. There are too many people carrying the backpacks with one strap on the shoulder, presenting a relaxed unprofessional appearance. Is the same happening to society with what is right and wrong? Are we lowering our standards?ReferencesTHE STUDY OF PHI LOSOPHY 5TH EDITION, S.MORRIS ENGELARISTOTLE ON THE MEAN, G.ZINIEWICZKANT, DUTY, AND RESPECT, P.STRATTON-LAKETHE NINETEENTH CENTURY ROUTLEDGE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY VOL. 7, C.L. TEN